+44 (0) 207 186 0880

SEIA reports that commercial solar deployments slowed in 2022's first half.

2020 and 2021 were both banner years for implementing solar energy in business settings. This growing pattern came to a complete and abrupt stop during the first half of 2022 due to issues in the supply chain, trade conflicts, and residual interruptions associated with pandemics.

The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) recently published a market analysis indicating that commercial solar deployment reached a total of 1.7 GW between 2020 and 2021. Offsite projects accounted for more than three-quarters of that total.

However, a blend of commercial considerations, increased costs, and a limited supply of personnel and materials have led to delays in the completion of projects, most notably those using offsite solar.

As a direct consequence, offsite installations up to June were "far off the pace planned in 2021," according to SEIA, with "many 2022 projects extending functional dates to 2023 or beyond."

During the year's first half, there was an increase of less than 1.5 GW in total commercial solar capacity. Over five gigawatts worth of capacity were added over the whole year of 2021.

The delay is noteworthy given that the SEIA reported that more than half of the 19 GW of corporate solar installed so far had been built since 2020.

According to a statement made by an industry trade association, one of the critical factors that have led to an increase in the number of commercial solar installations during the last decade has been a continuous drop in the price of solar energy. Since 2012, the company's dataset has onsite project examples in which the cost of installing a commercial system has decreased by 51%.

According to the research, increasing module pricing is primarily the result of regulatory trade measures, which have decreased module imports' availability and raised module prices. This has led to increased module pricing.
PPA costs for all utility-scale projects have been in the range of $16–$35/MWh in recent years, reflecting a decline in pricing for offsite systems.

In contrast to these general tendencies, however, commercial solar costs in two of the three size categories SEIA monitors have increased over the last year. According to what was found, prices for systems with more than one-megawatt capacity and less than one hundred kilowatts are at their highest point since 2019 and 2018, respectively.

It was said that installers are witnessing higher module price due mainly to regulatory trade measures that have restricted the availability of module imports and raised module costs. As a result, increased module pricing has been seen by installers.

Inflation on a global scale has also contributed to a rise in the price of hardware. Meanwhile, labor prices have increased "substantially" due to rising demand and following what the SEIA referred to as "structural changes in the U.S. labor force" brought on by the Covid-19 epidemic.

The conclusions of the analysis were derived from data collected at the system level from over 48,000 commercial solar systems. These systems accounted for approximately 70% of the total installed capacity as of June.

Expanding of the ground mounts

According to the research, most systems use roof mounting techniques; however, ground installations are becoming increasingly frequent as system sizes rise. It was reported that around 23% of systems employ ground mounting equipment, an increase from 16% at the end of 2018.

In addition, it was said that more than 94% of offsite corporate capacity employs single-axis trackers, following the trend away from fixed-tilt systems that have been going on for the last decade. Fixed-tilt systems are primarily used in smaller offsite systems that cannot justify the extra expenditure of adding trackers due to a lack of economies of scale.

Executives of companies

According to the Solar Means Business 2022 study, commercial solar capacity in the United States presently accounts for 14% of the total solar capacity deployed. It identified Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, and Walmart as the top five corporate solar energy consumers in the United States.

Early in 2019, Meta's installed solar capacity was 177 megawatts (MW), but it has since climbed to 3.6 gigawatts (GW). Target has maintained its position as the largest onsite corporate solar customer, while Microsoft has into the top 10 by adding 479 MW of additional capacity since 2019.

According to the survey, Walmart's combination of onsite and offsite solar installations has maintained the company in the top five over the last decade. As of 2021, around 46 percent of the world's need for power was met by renewable sources.

According to the research, Microsoft has added 479 MW of additional capacity since 2019.

According to the article, many major corporations, including Intel, Google, Switch, and Digital Realty, have begun implementing solar power systems inside their respective data center buildings. In addition, corporations involved in the food and beverage industry, such as Ab Inbev and Starbucks, corporations involved in health care, such as Kaiser Permanente and DaVita, and other notable brands, such as Home Depot and T-Mobile, were ranked among the top 25 corporate consumers of solar energy.

Based on the survey, nearly 2 GW of the 10 GW of offsite commercial solar installations is located in Virginia, where the need from technology businesses and data centers is driving the majority of the demand. Commercial solar power was used most extensively by Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Apple, and Digital Realty in this state.
According to the research, the number of U.S. enterprises that have installed at least 100 MW of solar power has increased to 23, up from 11 companies in 2019. Eighteen of the top 25 organizations rated in the survey are working toward using only renewable energy or being carbon neutral.

How about some growth?

As per SEIA, the total number of business solar installations is anticipated to quadruple once more over the following three years. Almost 27 GW of offsite corporate solar projects will come online by 2025. This is around one-third of the entire contracted solar pipeline.

According to the survey, third-party ownership remains common even if financing standards have been more streamlined in recent years. According to what was found, higher underwriting fees often make commercial loan products less appealing than residential ones. Additionally, it was said that most businesses use the cost of their power as an operational expenditure rather than a capital expense when compiling their financial statements.

Despite this, the market share of customer-owned systems is expected to increase to 68% during the first half of 2022, up from 52% in 2019. According to what was found, lenders have developed greater confidence in the commercial solar market and falling system prices have resulted in reduced capital outlay connected with system ownership.

We use cookies to provide you with the best possible browsing experience on our website. You can find out more below.
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
+Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
ResolutionUsed to ensure the correct version of the site is displayed to your device.
essential
SessionUsed to track your user session on our website.
essential
+Statistics
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Google AnalyticsGoogle Analytics is an analytics tool to measure website, app, digital and offline data to gain user insights.
Yes
No
Google Tag Manager
Yes
No

More Details